adopted as of July 26, 2016
Changed ON.Lab references to ONF August 4, 2017 after the assets of ON.Lab were transferred to ONF.
Governance of the CORD™ project is intended to foster a technical meritocracy within the context of stewardship by the CORD Chief Architect and the ONF Board of Directors. ONF is a nonprofit organization, and provides engineering resources on behalf of the CORD Project. CORD is also a project of the Linux Foundation, and as such, its governance model is consistent with LF best practices.
The goals of CORD project governance are to:
The principles of CORD governance are in line with these community values:
In addition, the over-arching governance principle is To act in the best interest of the broader community.
Two steering teams and a board of directors govern the CORD project. The two teams are the technical steering team and the community team.
The board is a group of representatives from the partner organizations. It is governed by the Chairman of the Board (the “Chairman”). The board has the following roles and responsibilities:
The board leaves all technical decisions to the technical steering team in the spirit of open source technical meritocracy practice.
The governance document for the board can be found here.
Two steering teams govern the CORD project.
The technical steering team is responsible for all technical decisions in the project. It is responsible for the content and structure of the code base and for all technical priorities with respect to the code base. The CORD chief architect (“Chief Architect”) is the team lead of the technical steering team. The ONF board of directors reserves the right to remove and replace the Chief Architect at any time.
Technical Steering Team Page
Email: CORDfirstname.lastname@example.org - Archive
The community steering team is responsible for the care and feeding of the community. It is responsible to address community issues, to grow the community and to make sure that the community thrives. The voting community elects the community steering team lead. The ONF board of directors reserves the right to approve or veto this selection, and to appoint the team lead.
Community Steering Team Page
Email: Coming soon
There are four classes of participation in the governance process. Each plays a different role in governance.
The Board is composed of a chairman and one member from ONF and each partner organization. In addition, each partner may name one alternative member to attend meetings in case the primary member is unable to attend. The maximum number of partner board members is 20. Each organization may only have one member on the board. The current board is found here.
The Open Networking Foundation Board of Directors chooses the Chairman of the Board. Each organization is responsible for nominating their board member. The Chairman must approve the nomination. Board members are (re) nominated/approved every year. Nominations/approvals are held in the first quarter of each calendar year. If any board member must leave before the end of their term, their organization will nominate a new member and the Chairman of the Board must approve that member. If the Chairman of the Board must step down, then the ONF Board of Directors will select a new Chairman.
2017 Elections Process and Information can be found here.
There are three classes of voting: ONF, Vendors and Service Providers. Each receives votes according to the following allocation of 100 votes. Votes may be fractional.
Should a tie occur on a vote, the Chairman of the Board will break the tie.
The technical steering team is responsible for all technical decisions having to do with the CORD project and the CORD core codebase (“CORD Core”). The CORD codebase is the software distribution represented by the CORD trademark. Sample applications or virtual network functions (VNFs), vendor proprietary extensions may or may not be part of the CORD Core. It is entirely up to the technical steering team to decide what constitutes the CORD Core. Projects within the CORD Project follow the project lifecycle document, which can be found here. The TST may amend the project lifecycle document with the approval of the Chief Architect.
As per the Project Lifecycle, incubated projects may graduate to either Mature-state or Core-state status. It is intended that threshold for having projects graduate to Mature-state will be lower and the process streamlined relative to having projects graduate to Core-state. The TST is intended to be an oversight body, and is not intended to have responsibility for patch-level project decisions.
The membership is found on the home page.
The following technical roles have been defined. The TST, with approval of the Chief Architect, shall have authority to modify, delete and create new technical roles from time to time.
There are several ways to become a member of the TST.
New technical steering team members will be elected on a yearly basis. Elections are held in the first quarter of each calendar year. At the time of election the following occurs:
If a team member leaves the team during the year, it is up to the Chief Architect to decide whether or not to hold an election to put someone else into the position before the next scheduled election.
The Technical Steering Team may organize a technical advisory group of architects, developers, and/or other community members. Members of this group do not have to have any affiliation with the CORD project. The goal of this group is twofold: solicit input from other experts in the field to guide the CORD architecture and generate advocacy in the larger ecosystem for the work being done with CORD. The Technical Steering Team chooses all the people on the technical advisory group.
The technical steering team will meet with the technical advisory group 2-4 times a year.
The community steering team is responsible for the care and feeding of the community. This team will be responsible to make sure the community has what it needs to function effectively. That may include
Elections are held in the first quarter of each calendar year. The team lead of the community steering team will be (re) elected by the voting community. In an election, the following will occur:
Anyone may volunteer to be a member of the team